# Data residency: a census of 149 listings

> Source: The Agents Index — https://theagentsindex.com/blog/data-residency-census (sourced research)
> By The Agents Index Editorial · Published 2026-10-05 · Updated 2026-10-12

_35 of 149 listings answer yes for “Data residency”. Counted from our own datasheet, with the query that reproduces every figure._

## Data residency, across 149 settled listings

Of the 149 Published listings whose datasheet settles “Data residency”, the largest group is “Qualified” at 101 (68%). Measured 2026-10-11.

| Listings | Count | Share of 149 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Yes | 35 | 23% |
| Qualified | 101 | 68% |
| No | 1 | 1% |
| Does not apply | 1 | 1% |
| Not established | 11 | 7% |

Denominator: 149 Published listings whose datasheet settles “Data residency”. Method: Counted from the stored datasheet answer for “Data residency” across every Published listing, all of which have a recognised stored answer on that row.

## The population

149 listings in this index are Published. This is the population as of 2026-10-11. 149 of the 149 published listings in this index carry a settled answer for “Data residency”. That row asks: Which jurisdiction holds the data? Every listing in the index is settled on this row, so nothing is left out.

## Findings

1. 35 of the 149 settled listings answer “Yes” for “Data residency”. That is 23% of the settled set.

2. 101 of the 149 settled listings answer “Qualified” for “Data residency”. That is 68% of the settled set.

3. 1 of the 149 settled listings answer “No” for “Data residency”. That is 1% of the settled set.

4. 1 of the 149 settled listings answer “Does not apply” for “Data residency”. That is 1% of the settled set.

5. 11 of the 149 settled listings answer “Not established” for “Data residency”. That is 7% of the settled set.

1 of those yes answers is VeraDial, which still answers yes for “Data residency”. Its [listing](/veradial) carries the stored answer and links to [the source recorded for it](https://veradial.com/privacy). This is one worked example, not an independent audit of every source in the census.

## What we counted, and how

Each figure above is a count over the “Data residency” row of the listing datasheet, taken from the same stored answer the listing page renders. The denominator is the 149 listings whose answer is settled, meaning one of yes, qualified, no, does not apply, not established. On this row that is the whole index, because every listing has a recognised stored answer. Every number here is stored with the read-only query that reproduces it and re-run every sixty seconds against the live corpus, so a figure that stops reproducing surfaces as drift rather than as a stale sentence nobody notices. Our full method covers how a datasheet row is settled in the first place.

## Limitations

This counts stored datasheet answers, not independently tested capabilities. A sourced answer can record a vendor statement or our reading of published evidence; this census does not re-fetch those sources. “Not established” means we have not established an answer. That can reflect vendor nondisclosure, blocked evidence, or unfinished research, not a no. An absent or unrecognised answer is excluded rather than treated as a researched finding. The figures are restated when the stored corpus changes; the date above is the count used for this published version, not a new verification of the vendors.

---

Tags: data-report, census