# Alternatives to Cresta

> Source: https://theagentsindex.com/cresta/alternatives (current datasheets, evidence-ranked)

Candidates share the baseline category or are previously researched peers. Requirements, preserved strengths, explicit trade-offs and research coverage decide the order; paid tier does not.

## Shortlist

### 1. Salesforce Agentforce

Salesforce's platform for building, deploying and monitoring AI agents on top of CRM data.

**Research coverage:** 35/35 criteria

**Where it improves on Cresta:**
- [Writes code: yes — The Agentforce Vibes coding agent turns a natural-language description into Salesforce code and metadata.](https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/developers/vibe-coding/)
- [Debugs and fixes: yes — Vibes runs the test or deployment, reads the failure and iterates toward a fix rather than stopping at the error.](https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/platform/agentforcevibes/guide/afv-agentic-dev.html)
- [Writes tests: yes — Apex test classes and LWC Jest tests are generated alongside the code, with a dedicated QA Validator sub-agent for coverage.](https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/platform/agentforcevibes/guide/afv-agentic-dev.html)

**Trade-offs against Cresta:**
- No researched regression against the baseline.

[View Salesforce Agentforce](https://theagentsindex.com/salesforce-agentforce)

### 2. LangChain

Open source agent frameworks plus LangSmith, a hosted platform to trace, evaluate, deploy and govern agents.

**Research coverage:** 34/35 criteria

**Where it improves on Cresta:**
- [Writes code: yes — The vendor ships dcode, a free open-source terminal coding agent that writes and runs code from a prompt; it is a separate package from the paid LangSmith platform.](https://www.langchain.com/dcode)
- [Ships it: yes — LangSmith Deployment runs agents in production with one-click deploy from Studio and a control-plane API; the free Developer plan shows Deployment as N/A, so shipping starts at Plus.](https://docs.langchain.com/langsmith/studio)
- [Agent permissions: yes — Human-in-the-loop interrupts gate agent actions in the framework, dcode gates code execution behind approval modes, and Fleet agents can run as themselves or as the calling user.](https://www.langchain.com/langgraph)

**Trade-offs against Cresta:**
- [Single sign-on: partial — Google and GitHub social login come with the cheap plans, but SAML single sign-on and SCIM provisioning are Enterprise-only; self-hosted installs can wire up almost any OIDC provider.](https://docs.langchain.com/langsmith/authentication-methods)

[View LangChain](https://theagentsindex.com/langchain)

### 3. Moveworks

Enterprise AI assistant and low-code agent platform for employee search and task automation.

**Research coverage:** 34/35 criteria

**Where it improves on Cresta:**
- [Agent permissions: yes — Policy validators enforce rules deterministically before an action runs, and a native approvals engine can require sequential, parallel or conditional human sign-off.](https://www.moveworks.com/us/en/developers)
- [GPT: yes — GPT models are the foundation models behind reasoning and are the only family selectable in LLM Actions, with gpt-5.4-mini as the default.](https://docs.moveworks.com/agent-studio/actions/llm-actions)
- [Model choice: partial — Builders may name a model per LLM Action from a fixed list, but the assistant's core routing is Moveworks' own gateway choosing the model, and org provider settings can narrow the list.](https://docs.moveworks.com/agent-studio/agentic-ai/ll-ms-sl-ms)

**Trade-offs against Cresta:**
- [Claude: no — The published LLM Action model reference lists only OpenAI GPT models on OpenAI Direct and Azure OpenAI; no Anthropic model appears in any environment column.](https://docs.moveworks.com/agent-studio/actions/llm-actions)

[View Moveworks](https://theagentsindex.com/moveworks)

### 4. Glean

Enterprise AI platform for building, governing and running agents on permission-aware company context.

**Research coverage:** 35/35 criteria

**Where it improves on Cresta:**
- [Writes code: yes — Code Writer proposes code changes and opens draft pull requests in GitHub, callable from Glean, agents or Slack.](https://docs.glean.com/administration/assistant/features/code-writer)
- [Debugs and fixes: yes — Vendor names bug fixes as a target task; the Resolve Jira ticket agent turns an issue into a review-ready PR.](https://docs.glean.com/administration/assistant/features/code-writer)
- [Claude: yes — Anthropic models are offered through Google Vertex AI or Amazon Bedrock, or directly with your own Anthropic key.](https://docs.glean.com/administration/llms)

**Trade-offs against Cresta:**
- [Ships it: no — It stops at a draft pull request; review and merge stay in the customer's source control.](https://docs.glean.com/administration/assistant/features/code-writer)
- [Done-for-you service: no — Glean sells licensed software; it manages the infrastructure and application but customers build and run their own agents.](https://docs.glean.com/get-started/prepare/about-deployment)

[View Glean](https://theagentsindex.com/glean)

### 5. MindStudio

No-code platform for building, running and deploying AI agents as drag-and-drop workflows.

**Research coverage:** 35/35 criteria

**Where it improves on Cresta:**
- [Ships it: yes — Publishing and deploying agents is unlimited on both paid tiers; deployment targets include hosted web apps, website embeds, webhooks, scheduled runs and, on Business, custom domains.](https://www.mindstudio.ai/pricing)
- [Claude: yes — Anthropic is a first-class publisher in the model catalogue with fifteen Claude entries listed alongside their per-million-token input and output rates.](https://www.mindstudio.ai/pricing)
- [GPT: yes — OpenAI models are available through the vendor's own routing layer with no separate OpenAI account required, and the catalogue lists GPT models by publisher.](https://www.mindstudio.ai/pricing)

**Trade-offs against Cresta:**
- [Admin controls: partial — Restricting which models and third-party services a workspace may reach, and controlling access per user, are ticked only in the Business column and crossed for Individual.](https://www.mindstudio.ai/pricing)
- [Single sign-on: partial — Single sign-on appears only in the Business plan's security bullets, and the vendor does not say whether that means SAML, OIDC or both.](https://www.mindstudio.ai/pricing)

[View MindStudio](https://theagentsindex.com/mindstudio)

### 6. Sierra

Enterprise platform for customer-service AI agents across voice, chat, email and messaging, priced by outcome.

**Research coverage:** 32/35 criteria

**Where it improves on Cresta:**
- [Agent permissions: yes — Autonomy is configurable per workflow: you set goals and guardrails and name the steps that require human sign-off before the agent proceeds.](https://sierra.ai/product/horizon)
- [How it meters: yes — Billing is per achieved outcome rather than per seat or per token, which Sierra states as its deliberate business model.](https://sierra.ai/product)
- [Opt out of training: yes — Sierra states customer data is never used to train models at all, so there is no opt-out to negotiate per tier.](https://sierra.ai/product/agent-sdk)

**Trade-offs against Cresta:**
- [Multi-agent: partial — Two vendor agents hand work to each other — Explorer's findings go straight to Ghostwriter — but customer-built agents coordinating on one task is not documented publicly.](https://sierra.ai/product/explorer)
- [Seat model: no — Pricing is not seat-based: Sierra charges for delivered results, so no per-seat rate, floor or ceiling is published.](https://sierra.ai/product/horizon)

[View Sierra](https://theagentsindex.com/sierra)

## Method

Unknown data is never treated as a benefit or a trade-off. Featured placement is labelled but cannot alter recommendation order.
