# Alternatives to Kore.ai

> Source: https://theagentsindex.com/kore-ai/alternatives/ (re-verified)
> Updated: 29 October 2026

## At a glance

| Name | Best for | Starts at | Better than Kore.ai at | Checked |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Kore.ai](https://theagentsindex.com/kore-ai.md) | Large regulated enterprises putting governed AI agents into service and operations | On quote | — | 28 October 2026 |
| [Blits.ai Agentic AI for the Enterprise](https://theagentsindex.com/blits-ai-agentic-ai-for-the-enterprise.md) | Enterprise operations teams automating governed workflows across business systems | On quote | Seat model, Single sign-on | 31 October 2026 |
| [ElevenLabs Agents](https://theagentsindex.com/elevenlabs-conversational-ai.md) | Developers and product teams who want ElevenLabs' voice quality and cloning as the foundation of their agent, and are comfortable assembling the rest of the stack themselves. | Free, then $6 a month | Free tier, Seat model | 18 October 2026 |
| [Dify](https://theagentsindex.com/dify.md) | Developers and teams who want an open-source, self-hostable platform to build RAG apps and agents with full data control. | Free, then $59 a month | Free tier | 1 November 2026 |
| [Manus](https://theagentsindex.com/manus.md) | Individuals and teams who want to offload whole multi-step tasks (research, simple builds, data work) to an autonomous agent rather than prompt a chatbot turn by turn. | Free, then $20 a month | Free tier, Seat model | 19 September 2026 |
| [Letta](https://theagentsindex.com/letta.md) | Developers and researchers who specifically need an agent whose memory, skills and identity genuinely persist and evolve across long-running sessions, rather than reset on every call. | Free, then $20 a month | Free tier | 2 September 2026 |
| [Genspark](https://theagentsindex.com/genspark.md) | A consultant, marketer, founder or operations lead who wants research, files, code, slides and media handled in one web workspace. | Free, then $24.99 a month | Free tier, Seat model | 26 October 2026 |

## What to watch for

- **ElevenLabs Agents**: Covers the voice + LLM-orchestration layer, not a turnkey ops product, CRM/helpdesk workflows, observability and compliance UI are yours to build.
- **Dify**: The "open-source" licence carries extra conditions beyond Apache-2.0, not unrestricted for every commercial use.
- **Manus**: Credit consumption is hard to predict; complex jobs can be costly.
- **Letta**: Smaller ecosystem and community than LangChain, LlamaIndex or Microsoft AutoGen.
- **Genspark**: Credit metering can make heavy agent, video, audio or multi-model runs difficult to forecast.

The ones people open most here come first, then the closest matches.

## Shortlist

### 1. Blits.ai Agentic AI for the Enterprise

Enterprise platform for governed agentic workflows across models, tools, data and systems.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Seat model: yes — Plan cards set named seat quantities from one on Basic through unlimited on Enterprise.](https://www.blits.ai/pricing)
- [Single sign-on: yes — The vendor documents Microsoft Azure AD/Entra and Google single-sign-on options, without naming a protocol.](https://www.blits.ai/features)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- None found.

[View Blits.ai Agentic AI for the Enterprise](https://theagentsindex.com/blits-ai-agentic-ai-for-the-enterprise)

### 2. ElevenLabs Agents

Hosted platform for building voice and chat agents, with telephony, SDKs and a choice of LLM.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: yes — A standing $0 Free plan on the Agents pricing page gives 15 call minutes a month and 4 concurrent calls, with the builder, knowledge base and widget included; no sales call, but commercial use starts at Starter.](https://elevenlabs.io/pricing/agents)
- [Seat model: yes — Two seat types with a hard ceiling: Full Seats are capped at 11 per self-serve workspace, every plan includes 20 Basic Seats, and Enterprise seat counts sit in the contract.](https://elevenlabs.io/docs/overview/administration/workspaces/members)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Self-hosted: partial — The full agent runtime can run in your own VPC or hardware on AWS or GCP, but the documentation is NDA-gated and sold through the account team; Azure is unreleased.](https://elevenlabs.io/docs/overview/capabilities/private-deployment)
- [Admin controls: partial — Guardrails constrain what an agent may say and per-tool approval constrains what it may do, but Guardrails is in Alpha and enabling MCP servers is not restricted to admins.](https://elevenlabs.io/docs/eleven-agents/best-practices/guardrails)
- [Audit log: partial — OCSF-schema logs over 100 administrative endpoints, pullable into a SIEM, but gated on Enterprise tier plus an API key holding audit_log_read.](https://elevenlabs.io/docs/overview/administration/workspaces/audit-logs)

[View ElevenLabs Agents](https://theagentsindex.com/elevenlabs-conversational-ai)

### 3. Gumloop

Multiplayer AI agent builder: teams build agents over their apps while IT keeps governance and spend control.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: partial — The pricing page offers no standing free plan: the cheapest way in is a 14-day free trial on the Pro column's button, after which Pro bills $37 a month, and Enterprise is quote-only via contact sales.](https://www.gumloop.com/pricing)
- [Seat model: yes — Seats and teams are unlimited on both plans with no per-seat charge or stated minimum, so cost scales with credit consumption instead of headcount.](https://www.gumloop.com/pricing)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Self-hosted: partial — Virtual Private Cloud deployment is an optional Enterprise line item only, and Gumloop operates the stack inside your cloud rather than handing you software to run.](https://www.gumloop.com/solutions/security)
- [Admin controls: partial — Pro limits connector guardrails to a single agent's scope; org-wide policies, role-based access and model access control are Enterprise-only rows in the same table.](https://www.gumloop.com/pricing)
- [Audit log: partial — Audit logs are marked absent on Pro and present on Enterprise, so administrative traceability requires the sales-led plan.](https://www.gumloop.com/pricing)

[View Gumloop](https://theagentsindex.com/gumloop)

### 4. Dust

Platform for building and running company agents on connected tools, data and 20+ models.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: yes — A Free seat type costs nothing and carries a one-time 500-credit lifetime allocation, so a buyer can start without a sales call but cannot run indefinitely.](https://docs.dust.tt/docs/user-documentation/admins/usage-seats-and-credits/credits.md)
- [Seat model: yes — Three seat types are priced per seat per month and can be mixed and reassigned within one workspace; no seat minimum is published, though SSO on Business is noted at 5+ seats.](https://dust.tt/home/pricing)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Agent permissions: partial — Admins separate what agents may access from who may use them, can restrict tools to skills, and the credit checkpoint asks a human before a long task continues; granular per-action approval policy is not published.](https://dust.tt/)
- [Self-hosted: partial — The isolation option Dust sells is a dedicated single-tenant deployment it runs on Enterprise; the MIT-licensed source exists but no self-hosting guide is published.](https://dust.tt/home/pricing)
- [Pooled budget: partial — Each paid seat has its own monthly credits first; a shared workspace pool exists but needs admin-purchased top-ups on Business and is contract-funded on Enterprise, and Free seats cannot touch it.](https://docs.dust.tt/docs/user-documentation/admins/usage-seats-and-credits/credit-management.md)

[View Dust](https://theagentsindex.com/dust)

### 5. Dify

Visual platform for agentic workflows and RAG, on Dify Cloud, your VPC or self-hosted.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: yes — The Sandbox cloud plan is free with 200 one-time message credits, and the self-hosted Community Edition is free with no license key required.](https://dify.ai/pricing/dify-enterprise)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Agent permissions: partial — You choose which Dify tools, skills and files an agent gets, and workflows can pause for human approval, but inside its sandbox the agent installs and runs command-line tools on its own that never appear in the Tools list.](https://docs.dify.ai/en/cloud/use-dify/build/new-agent/build)
- [Admin controls: partial — Four built-in roles decide who may build, publish or only use apps, and only owners and admins manage providers and billing; the comparison table withholds Role Management from the free Sandbox plan.](https://docs.dify.ai/en/cloud/use-dify/workspace/team-members-management.md)
- [Audit log: partial — Cloud gives per-app conversation and run logs; tamper-evident audit logs with SIEM streaming are an Enterprise capability.](https://dify.ai/dify-enterprise)

[View Dify](https://theagentsindex.com/dify)

### 6. Manus

General-purpose AI agent that plans and executes multi-step tasks on its own cloud computer.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: yes — A standing $0/month Free plan exists with 300 refresh credits every day, one concurrent task and two scheduled automations, so a buyer can use Manus without a call or a card; the pricing page itself shows only the paid cards, and the $40 Pro tier adds a separate 7-day free trial.](https://help.manus.im/en/articles/11711111-what-is-the-current-membership-pricing-for-manus)
- [Seat model: yes — Team buyers are billed per seat, starting at $20 per seat each month and including everything in the Pro plan plus SSO and internal access control; neither the pricing page nor the help article names a minimum seat count or an upper ceiling, so the floor and cap are unstated.](https://help.manus.im/en/articles/11711111-what-is-the-current-membership-pricing-for-manus)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Agent permissions: partial — It pauses for approval on sensitive actions (local commands, deploys, sending Gmail or Outlook mail, calendar writes), but each prompt offers Always Allow or global_allow, which switches that class off for good.](https://manus.im/docs/features/desktop)
- [Open models: no — The disclosed subprocessor list names only Google Cloud Platform and OpenAI as foundational-model providers; no open-weight model is named anywhere as running Manus.](https://trust.manus.im/subprocessors)
- [Model choice: partial — The platform is deliberately model-agnostic but the vendor does the choosing; users only pick between Manus's own tiers, and the Lite tier is all a free account gets.](https://trust.manus.im/)

[View Manus](https://theagentsindex.com/manus)

### 7. Letta

Stateful agent harness, cloud and SDK for agents with persistent, git-versioned memory.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: yes — A standing $0/month Free plan exists, not a trial: it caps you at 3 stateful agents and 5 MiB of storage per memory repository, with limited Letta Auto usage, and expects you to bring your own API keys or an external coding plan.](https://docs.letta.com/pricing)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [MCP server: no — MCP runs inbound only: Letta sessions consume stdio, HTTP and SSE MCP servers; no Letta MCP server is published.](https://docs.letta.com/agent-sdk/mcp/index.md)
- [Pooled budget: no — Quota attaches to each purchased Pro seat; unpaid seats get no Letta-hosted inference at all.](https://docs.letta.com/teams/quickstart/index.md)
- [Admin controls: partial — Org roles gate who reaches an agent; what the agent may run is set per machine or project, not centrally by an admin.](https://docs.letta.com/teams/permissions/index.md)

[View Letta](https://theagentsindex.com/letta)

### 8. Genspark

All-in-one AI workspace with an autonomous Super Agent plus agents for slides, docs, media and code.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: yes — Every new account starts on a standing Free plan with 100 credits a day and 1 GB of storage, though the daily refill stops once a lifetime free-credit allowance is used.](https://www.genspark.ai/helpcenter/membership-plans)
- [Seat model: yes — Team is priced per seat at $40 a month with a floor of two seats and a ceiling of 150; every admin counts as a paid seat and Enterprise has no stated seat minimum.](https://www.genspark.ai/helpcenter/team-enterprise-plans)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Agent permissions: partial — Tasks run through to a finished result without asking, and spending continues automatically when Free Quota runs out unless the member turns on the opt-in Ask First confirmation.](https://www.genspark.ai/helpcenter/membership-plans)
- [Open models: partial — Open-weight families such as DeepSeek, GLM and Kimi are offered, but only as Genspark-hosted entries in its own catalogue; nothing on these pages lets you supply or run your own weights.](https://www.genspark.ai/helpcenter/gencode)
- [Model choice: partial — A named subset of products exposes the full model list so you choose the model yourself; most products only offer a Standard or Ultra quality tier and the vendor picks the underlying model.](https://www.genspark.ai/helpcenter/credits-guide)

[View Genspark](https://theagentsindex.com/genspark)

### 9. PitchAI Agent Engine

Scheduled agents that run recurring office administration across accounting, CRM and mail systems.

**Where it improves on Kore.ai:**
- [Free tier: partial — You can start without a call or a setup fee using a small trial credit, but the grant is €5 (about $5.59) and the entry plan then charges for each completed job.](https://agents.pitchai.net/)

**Trade-offs against Kore.ai:**
- [Agent permissions: partial — Outward-facing actions are off unless explicitly granted for that process, so the default boundary is read-and-prepare with named human checkpoints before anything leaves the company.](https://agents.pitchai.net/)
- [Open models: partial — Open-weight families DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, GLM and Llama are listed as usable models, but the vendor never says whether they run in its own cloud or where.](https://agents.pitchai.net/)
- [Model choice: partial — The Engine, not the buyer, chooses a model per task; the vendor's claim is portability of the task definition across models rather than user-level model selection.](https://agents.pitchai.net/)

[View PitchAI Agent Engine](https://theagentsindex.com/agent-engine)