Julius AI vs TinyFish

Julius AI and TinyFish, side by side — the researched facts from the index.

How Julius AI and TinyFish compare

Feature	Julius AI	TinyFish
Description	Chat-based AI that turns your data into charts, reports, and presentations for knowledge workers.	Web APIs and browser agents for search, fetch, and multi-step automation, priced pay-as-you-go through one shared API key.
Pricing	$0/mo	$0 / per request
API	-	YesOne API key covers Mako, Search, Fetch, Agent, and Browser, with SDKs, a CLI, and MCP support.
Tags	Claude	APIBrowser useClaudeEnterpriseFree tier
Pricing model	freemium	usage-based
Free tier	Yes	Yes
Model / LLM	Own models plus frontier models including GPT-5.6, Claude Sonnet 5, and Claude Fable 5 depending on plan	Mako (TinyFish's proprietary web-native model)
Interface	Web	API
Public API	-	Yes
Open source	No	No
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Limitations	Usage is capped by an annual credits system rather than flat unlimited access, so heavy analysis can run into limits before the plan renews Published pricing is inconsistent across sources, with the Plus plan cited at $16, $20, and $35 per month depending on where you look, and one source reports a recent $15 price increase No public API is documented on Julius's own site or docs, limiting how far it can be embedded into other tools	CAPTCHA handling on the most aggressive sites still needs a third-party solver like CapSolver, so the anti-bot story has a real gap. Independent pricing coverage conflicts with TinyFish's own pricing page (one review cites $15 and $150 monthly plans, while the vendor site describes pure pay-as-you-go Wallet pricing), making budgeting hard to pin down before signup. Default concurrency is capped (2 concurrent Agent runs, 5 Browser sessions), so higher throughput requires contacting sales. Headline performance numbers (98.7% accuracy, 89.9% Mind2Web score) come from the vendor or a single review site, not an independently reproduced benchmark.