Browserbase vs SalesTouch
Browserbase and SalesTouch, side by side — the researched facts from the index.
On this page
How Browserbase and SalesTouch compare
| Feature | Browserbase | SalesTouch |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Cloud browser infrastructure and APIs for building and running browser automation and AI agents | A remote MCP server that gives AI agents like Claude and Codex direct LinkedIn outreach tools, no extension required |
| Pricing | $0 / mo | $39/month |
| Tags | ||
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Model / LLM | Model-agnostic; Model Gateway API provides access to every major LLM | Connects to Claude, Codex, Hermes, and OpenClaw (bring your own agent) |
| Interface | API | API |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Limitations |
|
|
Who each one is for
Browserbase
Developers building browser agents who want one API instead of managing browser infra
From $0 / mo
SalesTouch
Sales and developer teams already running Claude or Codex through MCP who want a single endpoint for LinkedIn reads, outreach, and engagement without a browser extension.
From $39/month
The digest
Decided? Watch the bench move. New agents, fresh verdicts, moves in the rankings, one short email, every Tuesday.
Related comparisons and alternatives
Still deciding? Get a quote from Browserbase or SalesTouch
Pick the one you want to hear from and tell us what you need. We make that introduction — only that one.