9 researched matches
Alternatives to Rox
Find a better fit for what you need. Compare alternatives to Rox with sourced features, strengths and trade-offs side by side.
On this page
Your reason for switching
What needs to be different?
Choose up to three requirements, or see the closest matches now ↓.
Evidence-backed shortlist
Closest researched alternatives to Rox
Ordered by the requirements met, strengths preserved, explicit trade-offs and research coverage. Sponsorship does not enter the order.
- 01
Artisan
AI BDR that runs outbound end to end: finds leads, sends personalized email, handles replies, books meetings.
Custom, contact salesWhere it improves on Rox
- +Done-for-you service · PartialYou run the software, but Artisan attaches people to it: every business plan includes a CSM and guided onboarding, and Enterprise adds a forward-deployed strategist, engineer and campaign specialist who build and launch the rollout. Self-serve Startups plans are unassisted.Evidence ↗
- +Runs autonomously · YesAva runs the full loop unattended (prospecting, sending, reply handling and meeting booking), with approvals optional rather than required. A fuller 'Full self-driving Ava' mode is still listed as Soon in the plan table.Evidence ↗
- +MCP server · YesArtisan runs an authenticated MCP server on every plan, exposing about 30 account tools: prospect search, list building, enrichment, campaign drafting and credit balance. Permissions are per tool and no API key is involved. It cannot launch a campaign; changes save as drafts. A separate unauthenticated MCP server exposes only marketing pages.Evidence ↗
Trade-offs against Rox
- −Open models · NoAva runs on models Artisan owns; no open-weight or self-supplied model option appears in the four-tier plan comparison, including Enterprise.Evidence ↗
- −Model choice · NoThe vendor picks the model. Artisan describes the models as its own, and the 30-plus row plan comparison contains no model-selection row on any tier.Evidence ↗
- −Self-hosted · NoArtisan operates the servers; no self-hosted, on-premise or private-cloud deployment appears anywhere in the four-tier plan comparison, including Enterprise.Evidence ↗
34/35 researched criteria · 1 not established - 02
Warmly
Identifies anonymous website visitors and runs AI inbound and outbound GTM agents on one shared context graph.
$4,875 / quarter (or $10,000/yr, annual)Where it improves on Rox
- +Done-for-you service · PartialSoftware you run, with an optional dedicated Warmly engineer and outsourced SDR placements sold as separate service lines.Evidence ↗
- +Runs autonomously · YesThe GTM Brain layer decides and executes without waiting for a human to act on a dashboard.Evidence ↗
- +GPT · YesAll AI features run on OpenAI's pre-trained models; Warmly trains no models of its own.Evidence ↗
Trade-offs against Rox
- −Agent permissions · PartialAgents act on their own; humans get visibility and an override on each decision rather than an approval gate.Evidence ↗
- −Claude · NoThe AI FAQ names OpenAI as the provider of all Warmly AI.Evidence ↗
- −Open models · NoInference is OpenAI-only by the vendor's own statement; no open-weight option is offered.Evidence ↗
35/35 researched criteria - 03
11x
AI SDR and inbound phone agent for outbound prospecting and real-time lead qualification.
$3,750 / monthWhere it improves on Rox
- +Runs autonomously · YesVendor claims the digital workers execute complex tasks without supervision; Alice books meetings on autopilot.Evidence ↗
- +Seat model · YesSeats are capped per tier: 5 end users on Growth, 10 on Pro, unlimited on Enterprise.Evidence ↗
- +Admin controls · YesApproval workflows gate outgoing messages, and CRM access is constrained by granular read/write permissions.Evidence ↗
Trade-offs against Rox
- −Self-hosted · NoSingle-tenant hosting on your own infrastructure is not offered; all customer data sits in the vendor's AWS estate.Evidence ↗
- −Free tier · NoNo free or self-serve tier: the entry plan is an annual paid contract and every plan CTA routes to sales.Evidence ↗
28/35 researched criteria · 7 not established - 04
Lead Scorer
AI SDR that sources companies from the French State registry, scores them and drafts outreach for your approval.
€0/monthWhere it improves on Rox
- +Done-for-you service · PartialSoftware you run yourself on Free and Pro; the Done for You tier at EUR 299/month adds a setup interview, the vendor implementing the acquisition strategy and a monthly review.Evidence ↗
- +Claude · YesClaude, Claude Code and Codex connect to the MCP endpoint and call every tool; the model behind the vendor's own in-app drafting is not named.Evidence ↗
- +GPT · YesChatGPT developer mode and Codex are supported MCP clients; as with Claude this is the assistant driving the product, not a model the vendor runs for you.Evidence ↗
Trade-offs against Rox
- −Multi-agent · PartialA drafting model (Luna) and a second reviewing model run in sequence on every message; the vendor describes a pipeline of models, not agents negotiating a shared task.Evidence ↗
- −Agent permissions · PartialIt may discover, enrich, score, draft and queue on its own; spending and sending are fenced. Billable tools estimate first and refuse oversized calls, and no tool can put a campaign into sending.Evidence ↗
- −A company can buy it · NoSold to individuals. Accounts are single-user with isolated data; a shared workspace is not something you can buy today.Evidence ↗
32/35 researched criteria · 3 not established - 05
Amplemarket
AI sales platform whose Duo agents find buying signals and draft multichannel outreach for revenue teams.
$600 / month, billed annually, 2 seats includedWhere it improves on Rox
- +GPT · YesOpenAI is the named subprocessor behind Duo Copywriter and the reply assistant, and ChatGPT is also a supported MCP client.Evidence ↗
- +In your editor · PartialNo IDE extension of its own: Cursor reaches Amplemarket data through the same MCP server as Claude and ChatGPT.Evidence ↗
- +On the command line · PartialAmplemarket ships no CLI; the MCP server is reachable from Claude Code at a terminal.Evidence ↗
Trade-offs against Rox
- −Multi-agent · PartialDistinct agents split one outbound motion: daily signal scanning, research, then sequence writing. The vendor never describes them coordinating or handing off.Evidence ↗
- −Agent permissions · PartialIn-app the agent stops at a draft for the rep to send; over MCP the per-action approval prompt is enforced by the AI client, not by Amplemarket.Evidence ↗
- −Open models · NoThe complete 18-entry subprocessor register names OpenAI as the only inference provider; there is no model selection, no bring-your-own weights and no self-hosting.Evidence ↗
34/35 researched criteria · 1 not established - 06
Unify
AI outbound agents that research accounts, build prospect lists and run email sequences.
$0Where it improves on Rox
- +Runs autonomously · YesPlays run signal-triggered workflows unattended, chaining research, prospecting and sequence enrolment.Evidence ↗
- +GPT · YesGPT is the model on every tier; the newer GPT release is reserved for Business.Evidence ↗
- +In your editor · PartialNo native IDE plugin; Unify reaches Cursor via its MCP server and official plugin.Evidence ↗
Trade-offs against Rox
- −Multi-agent · PartialAgents are composable steps inside a Play rather than peers negotiating a task; multi-step agents research, qualify and personalise.Evidence ↗
- −Agent permissions · PartialReps can view but not edit Plays or exclusion settings; only Admins configure what the agent may act on.Evidence ↗
- −Claude · NoThe plan table enumerates model access as GPT only; Anthropic appears as a backend subprocessor, not a selectable model.Evidence ↗
34/35 researched criteria · 1 not established
Full datasheet
Compare Rox with the shortlist
Replace any candidate, show every criterion, or keep only differences and unknowns.
Compare alternatives to Rox
Keep Rox as the baseline and choose up to three alternatives. Differences and unanswered criteria appear first.
The digest
Done comparing? Watch the field move. Which agents actually ship, one short email, every Tuesday.
Advertisement
Sponsor this page. Alternatives pages are read by buyers actively choosing an agent, first-party inventory, clearly labelled, sold by the week.
Sponsor this page →Featured · top of your category →Method
How the shortlist is calculated
Comparable first. We consider listings in the same category as Rox and alternatives previously researched for this page.
Requirements first. We prioritise your selected needs, then shared strengths, fewer documented trade-offs, more complete research and finally alphabetical order.
Unknown remains unknown. Missing evidence is never converted into a benefit or a trade-off. Every improvement shown above comes from the same sourced criterion as the listing.
Independent order. Payment does not affect selection or ranking. Paid placements are labelled Advertisement.
Where next? Back to the full research, deeper into the category, or get your own agent into the index.
Advertise here
Reach buyers mid-decision. Reach builders choosing their next agent. Promote your brand with a display placement or bring your listing into focus with Featured.
Explore owner options →Advertise on this page →The digestFree
Which agents actually ship.
What we re-checked, what got added, and one number from the index. Tuesdays.
One-click unsubscribe