Skip to content

Find and compare AI agents

Top 6 of 22 alternatives

Alternatives to VoiceAgents

Find a better fit. See what each alternative to VoiceAgents does better, where it falls short, and what it costs.

Your reason for switching

What needs to be different?

Pick up to three, or see the closest matches ↓.

Requirements for an alternative to VoiceAgents
More reasons (7)
0/3 selected

Shortlist

Closest alternatives to VoiceAgents

Best match first. How we rank

  1. 01

    ElevenLabs Agents

    Hosted platform for building voice and chat agents, with telephony, SDKs and a choice of LLM.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listDone-for-you service · PartlySelf-serve software you run, but enterprises can buy ElevenLabs Forward Deployed Engineers who scope, build and stabilise the deployment; no price is published.Source ↗

    Where it improves on VoiceAgents

    • +Multi-agent · YesAn orchestrator agent routes a live conversation to specialist agents on natural-language conditions, and transfers can be nested; the transcript carries across.Source ↗
    • +Agent permissions · YesTool use is gated per MCP server and per tool: always ask, fine-grained (auto-approved, requires approval, disabled), or no approval at all.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against VoiceAgents

    None found.

  2. 02

    Vapi

    Developer platform for building, testing and deploying voice AI agents that make and receive phone calls.

    From $0.05/minute

    Why it's on this listDone-for-you service · PartlyYou build and run the agent yourself; the Scale contract adds an embedded Vapi engineer for the go-live, not a done-for-you build.Source ↗

    Where it improves on VoiceAgents

    • +Multi-agent · YesSquads route one conversation across several specialised assistants with context-preserving handoffs.Source ↗
    • +Open models · YesOpen-weight models reach the pipeline through Groq, Together AI, Mistral, DeepSeek and OpenRouter, or a self-hosted server.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against VoiceAgents

    • −Opt out of training · PartlyThe privacy policy reserves call content for model training and names no toggle; the $1,000/month ZDR add-on is the only documented way to stop it being kept at all.Source ↗
  3. 03

    Cartesia

    Real-time speech models and a managed runtime for production phone and web voice agents.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listOpen models · PartlyThe LLM layer routes through LiteLLM to 100+ providers, but the vendor names only Anthropic, OpenAI and Google, and its own speech models are API-only.Source ↗

    Where it improves on VoiceAgents

    • +On the command line · YesA `cartesia` CLI creates, deploys and manages agents, and can chat with agent logic locally.Source ↗
    • +Self-hosted · PartlyOn-premise or VPC model deployment is sales-gated; separately, agent reasoning code can run on your own servers with Cartesia connecting to your URL.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against VoiceAgents

    • −Opt out of training · PartlyOpt-out is by request form for selected categories of content; Enterprise plans can additionally enable Zero Data Retention for TTS and STT inference.Source ↗
  4. 04

    Deepgram Voice Agent API

    One WebSocket API that runs speech-to-text, LLM orchestration and text-to-speech for real-time voice agents.

    From $0.05/minute

    Why it's on this listMulti-agent · PartlyHandoff between specialised agents is a documented pattern with a reference implementation you run yourself: your orchestrator opens a fresh Voice Agent session per agent and summarises context between them. The API itself has no built-in agent-to-agent coordination.Source ↗

    Where it improves on VoiceAgents

    • +Open models · YesOpen-weight LLMs are listed as supported models: gpt-oss-20b through Groq, which requires you to supply the endpoint, and an NVIDIA Nemotron model that Deepgram manages. Deepgram's own speech and voice weights are not distributed.Source ↗
    • +On the command line · PartlyThe dg CLI covers transcription, synthesis, text analysis and account management; its own getting-started enumeration and command reference contain no voice-agent command, while the agentic-tools page claims the CLI reaches voice agents. Both statements are recorded in notes.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against VoiceAgents

    • −Free tier · PartlyA $200 signup credit with no credit card required, spendable on any endpoint including the agent, plus a hosted playground. It is a credit grant, not a free tier: once it is spent, every call is metered.Source ↗
  5. 05

    LiveKit Agents

    Open-source Python and Node.js framework for voice AI agents, with LiveKit Cloud hosting, telephony and observability.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listMulti-agent · YesMultiple agents in one session via handoffs, plus a supervisor pattern where one agent keeps control and delegates to scoped tasks.Source ↗

    Where it improves on VoiceAgents

    • +Open models · YesOpen-weight models are the recommended default in LiveKit Inference (Gemma 4 31B, GPT OSS 120B, DeepSeek), and the Ollama plugin runs models locally.Source ↗
    • +On the command line · YesThe lk CLI creates projects, deploys agents and manages LiveKit Cloud; agents can also be run and talked to locally in console mode.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against VoiceAgents

    • −Pooled budget · PartlyNo per-user balances: allowances pool inside a project. Sharing one plan across projects, and quotas managed at workspace level, are Enterprise only.Source ↗
  6. 06

    PolyAI

    Enterprise platform for building voice and chat agents that resolve customer calls, priced per minute.

    Why it's on this listDone-for-you service · PartlySelf-serve software plus vendor-delivered work: PolyAI builds and maintains managed dashboards, configures managed-service integrations, and runs an enterprise build of roughly six weeks.Source ↗

    Where it improves on VoiceAgents

    • +Open models · PartlyThe model catalogue enumerates only Raven, OpenAI and Amazon Bedrock (Claude, Nova) with no open-weight option, but you can attach your own LLM endpoint.Source ↗
    • +On the command line · YesThe poly CLI pulls, branches, validates, pushes and chats against a project from the terminal.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against VoiceAgents

    • −Pooled budget · PartlyConversation volume draws on one account-level Subscription Volume of CX Tokens, but the Wren builder allowance is per person and not shared.Source ↗
    • −Opt out of training · PartlyCustomer conversations reach Raven training only where the contract authorises it, and the privacy notice relies on consent where law requires; no self-serve opt-out control is documented.Source ↗

Side by side

Compare VoiceAgents with the shortlist

Compare alternatives to VoiceAgents

Pick up to three alternatives to see how they differ from VoiceAgents.

Loading comparison…

The digest

Which agents actually ship. New agents and articles, by email, at most once a week.

Advertisement

Reach buyers choosing an agent. Billed monthly. Cancel anytime.

See ad options →Featured · top of your category →

Advertise here

Reach builders choosing their next agent.

See ad options →Feature your listing →

The digestFree

Which agents actually ship.

New agents and articles, by email, at most once a week.

One-click unsubscribe