Skip to content

Find and compare AI agents

Top 6 of 43 alternatives

Alternatives to Manus

Find a better fit. See what each alternative to Manus does better, where it falls short, and what it costs.

Your reason for switching

What needs to be different?

Pick up to three, or see the closest matches ↓.

Requirements for an alternative to Manus
More reasons (7)
0/3 selected

Shortlist

Closest alternatives to Manus

Best match first. How we rank

  1. 01

    Salesforce Agentforce

    Salesforce's platform for building, deploying and monitoring AI agents on top of CRM data.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listWrites tests · YesApex test classes and LWC Jest tests are generated alongside the code, with a dedicated QA Validator sub-agent for coverage.Source ↗

    Where it improves on Manus

    • +Done-for-you service · PartlyAgentforce is software the customer configures in a low-code builder; Salesforce separately sells Professional Services that performs the hands-on build, reached through an account executive rather than bundled with the product.Source ↗
    • +Claude · YesAnthropic Claude models are named rows in the supported-model table, and the non-default AWS-Hosted Agentforce model option is a Claude model on Amazon Bedrock.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against Manus

    None found.

  2. 02

    LangChain

    Open source agent frameworks plus LangSmith, a hosted platform to trace, evaluate, deploy and govern agents.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listDone-for-you service · PartlyYou run the software yourself on every self-serve plan; only Enterprise buyers get LangChain engineers, architectural guidance and team training alongside the product.Source ↗

    Where it improves on Manus

    • +Agent permissions · YesHuman-in-the-loop interrupts gate agent actions in the framework, dcode gates code execution behind approval modes, and Fleet agents can run as themselves or as the calling user.Source ↗
    • +Claude · YesA first-party langchain-anthropic package covers Claude with tool calling, structured output and streaming, and the LLM Gateway routes Anthropic model IDs with one LangSmith key.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against Manus

    • −Debugs and fixes · PartlyLangSmith Engine diagnoses failures from production traces and opens a GitHub pull request with the fix, but a human still merges it, and Engine is absent from the free Developer plan.Source ↗
  3. 03

    Glean

    Enterprise AI platform for building, governing and running agents on permission-aware company context.

    Why it's on this listClaude · YesAnthropic models are offered through Google Vertex AI or Amazon Bedrock, or directly with your own Anthropic key.Source ↗

    Where it improves on Manus

    • +GPT · YesOpenAI models are listed in the Model Hub text-model table, via Azure or OpenAI directly.Source ↗
    • +Open models · YesOpen-weight models are a named tier in the rate card, served through Fireworks or Baseten.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against Manus

    • −Ships it · NoIt stops at a draft pull request; review and merge stay in the customer's source control.Source ↗
    • −Free tier · NoLicensed per user per month with an upfront usage commit; every call to action on the site is a demo request, and no self-serve or free tier is published.Source ↗
  4. 04

    Devin

    Cloud AI software engineer that takes a ticket, works in its own VM, and opens a pull request.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listIf the underlying job is really software, not a report: a dedicated autonomous coding agent that plans, edits, tests and opens a reviewed pull request on its own cloud machine — narrower than Manus's do-anything scope, but purpose-built and more predictable for code specifically, from a comparable $20/month Pro tier.

    Where it improves on Manus

    • +Writes tests · YesAnalyses the repository's existing test style and writes additional tests to raise coverage.Source ↗
    • +Whole-codebase work · YesMigrations spanning many files, modules or whole repositories are the stated use for fanning work out to parallel sessions.Source ↗
    • +Agent permissions · YesGraded modes from prompt-before-writing up to full bypass, plus an OS-sandboxed autonomous mode.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against Manus

    • −Ships it · PartlyStops at the pull request in your repository; your team merges and ships through its existing pipeline.Source ↗
    • −Certifications · PartlySOC 2 Type II since September 2024; the Trust Center additionally lists ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and CCPA, behind an NDA request.Source ↗
  5. 05

    UiPath Agent Builder

    Low-code canvas in UiPath Studio Web for building AI agents that run on the UiPath automation platform.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listAgent permissions · YesThe agent can act only through tools you explicitly grant it, per-tool guardrails evaluate deterministic rules before and after each call with Log, Filter, Block or Escalate actions, and a max-iterations setting caps its reasoning loops.Source ↗

    Where it improves on Manus

    • +Claude · YesAnthropic is one of only three model providers the Agents documentation lists as selectable for an agent, served through AWS Bedrock, and you choose it per agent in the Properties panel.Source ↗
    • +GPT · YesOpenAI is a first-class provider in the Agents model documentation and in the platform LLM configuration table, selectable per agent alongside Anthropic and Google.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against Manus

    • −Writes code · PartlyAutopilot generates and extends agent logic from a prompt inside the canvas, and third-party coding agents can author the same projects, but what it writes is agent configuration on a low-code canvas rather than source code in your repository.Source ↗
    • −Pooled budget · PartlyIt splits by phase: run-time consumption defaults to a zero tenant allocation and draws from the organisation pool, while the design-time AI and Agentic allowance is sized per seat grade and the docs say plainly it cannot be pooled.Source ↗
  6. 06

    Agno

    Python SDK plus self-hosted AgentOS runtime and hosted control plane for building and operating agents.

    From Free

    Why it's on this listDone-for-you service · PartlyYou run the software yourself on every plan, but Enterprise bundles hands-on engineering help building your product agent plus monthly office hours.Source ↗

    Where it improves on Manus

    • +Agent permissions · YesTools can require confirmation, user input or external execution, and the bundled workspace tool gates destructive operations behind human confirmation by default.Source ↗
    • +Claude · YesAnthropic Claude is a first-class provider with its own adapter, selectable by the `anthropic` provider key and supported for mid-session model switching.Source ↗

    Trade-offs against Manus

    • −Ships it · PartlyPublishing is deliberately outside the default loop; commits, PRs and deploys must be exposed as separately gated tools.Source ↗
    • −In your pipeline · NoThe enumerated serving surfaces are REST, MCP in Claude/ChatGPT and chat apps; no pull-request or CI surface appears.Source ↗
    • −Pooled budget · NoThere is no shared balance to pool because nothing inside a connection is metered; seats and connections are each priced individually and usage is unlimited.Source ↗

Side by side

Compare Manus with the shortlist

Compare alternatives to Manus

Pick up to three alternatives to see how they differ from Manus.

Loading comparison…

The digest

Which agents actually ship. New agents and articles, by email, at most once a week.

Advertisement

Reach buyers choosing an agent. Billed monthly. Cancel anytime.

See ad options →Featured · top of your category →

Advertise here

Reach builders choosing their next agent.

See ad options →Feature your listing →

The digestFree

Which agents actually ship.

New agents and articles, by email, at most once a week.

One-click unsubscribe