Ranked · Agent platforms
The Best AI Agent Platforms (2026)
13 AI agent-building platforms — OpenClaw, n8n, Dify, Botpress, Sim, Lindy, Relevance AI, Salesforce Agentforce, Moveworks, Glean, Vecbase, MindStudio and Vellum — compared on what actually splits them: open-source and self-hostable vs. closed-source and cloud-only, flat published pricing vs. metered credits or sales-gated contracts, general-purpose vs. CRM-native vs. search-first, and customer-facing vs. employee-facing.
The ranking
22 agents, compared. Start with fit and price, then open the full assessment. Payment does not alter this ranking. Selection and method ↓
All picks at a glance
Compare fit and price, then choose a name to read the full assessment.
| # | Agent | Best for | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenClawOpen and self-hostable: single-operator first, reachable from messaging apps instead of a dashboard. | Developers and self-hosters who already run their own infrastructure and want one personal AI agent that reaches WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Signal and iMessage instead of a separate app. | $20/mo |
| 2 | VellumOpen and self-hostable, with a cloud option: a personal AI assistant, not a team workflow builder | Free | |
| 3 | n8nOpen and self-hostable: workflow automation first, with AI-agent nodes built invs Dify | Ops and automation teams who want to build agentic workflows visually while keeping data on self-hosted infrastructure. | Free |
| 4 | DifyOpen and self-hostable: an LLM-app and RAG platform first, with agents built invs n8n | Developers and teams who want an open-source, self-hostable platform to build RAG apps and agents with full data control. | Free |
| 5 | BotpressOpen and self-hostable: a conversational agent and chat-channel platform first | Engineering-led teams building a multi-channel AI support agent who want an open-source, self-hostable core with an optional managed cloud layer. | Free |
| 6 | SimOpen and self-hostable: an all-in-one AI workspace first | Dev teams wanting an open-source, API-first workspace to build and deploy AI agents | Free |
| 7 | LindyClosed and cloud-only: the simplest on-ramp to a single AI "employee"vs n8n | Teams that want an AI teammate embedded in Slack and a no-code app builder under the same plan, with usage that pauses at the credit cap rather than overage-billing. | $29.99/seat/mo |
| 8 | VecbaseClosed and cloud-only: a shared workspace you staff, not a builder you configure | Small teams or solo operators who want pre-built AI agent roles, shared files, and OAuth-driven workflows under one credit-based subscription. | Subscription |
| 9 | MindStudioClosed and cloud-only: breadth-first, one platform instead of many tools | Free | |
| 10 | Relevance AIClosed and cloud-only: the most production-grade, built for multi-agent "workforces" | Revenue, ops, and customer success teams running 5+ agents in production, who want multi-agent orchestration with evals, tracing, and SSO-grade governance on one bill. | Free |
| 11 | Salesforce AgentforceCRM-native: the enterprise outlier, bundled into an existing Salesforce investment | Salesforce service, sales, field-service and employee-support teams that need agents to act on CRM records and have Salesforce admin or developer capacity. | Freemium |
| 12 | MoveworksEmployee-facing, ticket-resolution first: never touches customer supportvs Glean | Large, often regulated enterprises (finance, healthcare, government-adjacent) that want one AI assistant handling IT, HR and finance requests across 100+ existing systems, and that value deep compliance certification over self-serve simplicity. | On quote |
| 13 | GleanEmployee-facing, search-first: a Knowledge Graph with agents layered on topvs Moveworks | Large and mid-market enterprises whose biggest AI-agent blocker is fragmented, permission-sensitive knowledge scattered across 100+ internal tools, and who want employees building department-specific agents on that indexed knowledge without writing code. | On quote |
| 14 | ManusIn this category, not yet ranked | Individuals and teams who want to offload whole multi-step tasks (research, simple builds, data work) to an autonomous agent rather than prompt a chatbot turn by turn. | Free |
| 15 | ElevenLabs AgentsIn this category, not yet ranked | Developers and product teams who want ElevenLabs' voice quality and cloning as the foundation of their agent, and are comfortable assembling the rest of the stack themselves. | Free |
| 16 | GC AIIn this category, not yet ranked | In-house legal teams and corporate counsel who need fast, cited research across US case law, statutes and regulations without engaging outside counsel for a first pass. | $500/mo |
| 17 | LettaIn this category, not yet ranked | Developers and researchers who specifically need an agent whose memory, skills and identity genuinely persist and evolve across long-running sessions, rather than reset on every call. | Free |
| 18 | CrestaIn this category, not yet ranked | Large enterprises running high-volume | $150,000/yr |
| 19 | GensparkIn this category, not yet ranked | A consultant, marketer, founder or operations lead who wants research, files, code, slides and media handled in one web workspace. | Free |
| 20 | AgnoIn this category, not yet ranked | Python developers who want an Apache 2.0 SDK with memory, knowledge, learning, guardrails and a Control Plane they run inside their own cloud account, and who are comfortable running Docker or a cloud deploy template themselves. | Free |
| 21 | UiPath Agent BuilderIn this category, not yet ranked | On quote | |
| 22 | Aisera Agent StudioIn this category, not yet ranked | On quote |
Selection, context, and ranking method
All thirteen of these call themselves an "AI agent platform," but they split on real axes, not one ranking. n8n, Dify and Botpress are all open-source and self-hostable via Docker, and each entered the space from a different starting point. n8n started as a visual workflow-automation tool with AI-agent nodes layered on top, so its scope is any automation, not agents specifically; Dify started as an LLM-app platform with a built-in RAG pipeline, so its scope is building and shipping model-backed apps and agents; Botpress started, and stays, conversational-agent-first, so its Studio, channel deployment (WhatsApp, Messenger, Slack, Teams, Telegram, voice) and bi-directional MCP support are all built around one agent that talks to people across many surfaces, not a general workflow or RAG canvas. Of the three, only Botpress is genuinely MIT-licensed (n8n is fair-code/source-available, Dify's licence carries conditions beyond pure Apache-2.0); it is also the newest and smallest by funding, a $25M Series B against n8n's and Dify's larger rounds. Lindy and Relevance AI are both closed-source and cloud-only. Lindy is the simplest on-ramp: a no-code builder for single AI "employees" that automate recurring inbox, meeting and CRM busywork. Relevance AI is the more production-grade of the two, purpose-built for orchestrating multi-agent "workforces" with a cost-optimising LLM router, evals, tracing and RBAC/SSO.
One pattern is worth weighing across n8n, Dify, Lindy and Relevance AI before you commit: n8n's Cloud tiers and Dify's Cloud tiers both publish flat monthly or annual prices. Lindy and Relevance AI both meter usage in credits instead, and that metering has a real, documented cost: independent reviews repeatedly flag Lindy's overage charges as a billing surprise, and Relevance AI's own dual "Actions plus Vendor Credits" meter is easy to misjudge on AI-heavy agents (its pricing page now foregrounds a custom Enterprise quote over self-serve numbers). None of that makes the credit-metered platforms worse, and Relevance AI in particular ships production controls the flat-rate pair does not, but it means the real cost of scaling up is a question worth modelling before you buy, not just the number on the pricing page. Botpress sits in a third pattern of its own: a flat-published base subscription. Free costs $0 (100 conversations, 3 seats, 3 AI agents), Plus $150/month billed annually (250 conversations, $25 AI usage included) and Team $750/month (1,500 conversations, $150 AI usage included), with a 20% discount on annual billing. AI usage is INCLUDED on paid tiers rather than billed separately, so the published price covers anything below the bundled allowance.
Salesforce Agentforce sits in a category of its own: a CRM-native platform bundled into an existing Salesforce investment rather than a standalone tool you adopt on its own. No other entry here puts agents this close to live sales, service and commerce data, since every agent can call Salesforce Flows, Apex and MuleSoft directly against real records. It is also genuinely model-agnostic (GPT-5.x, Claude, Gemini via its Models API), with a real developer surface (Agent API, Python SDK, CLI). The tradeoff is Salesforce-scale complexity: pricing runs on mutually-exclusive Flex Credits or Conversations meters that have already reshaped themselves multiple times since its October 2024 launch, full cross-system context requires the separately-priced Data Cloud (rebranded Data 360), and independent buyer reports describe multi-week pilots and multi-month production rollouts, a different order of commitment than n8n, Dify, Lindy or Relevance AI.
Moveworks breaks the pattern a different way again: every other platform here CAN point its agents at customers, staff, or both, depending on configuration. Moveworks points exclusively inward: IT, HR and finance requests for a company's own employees, resolved across 100+ connected systems like ServiceNow, Workday and Okta, never customer-facing support. Its compliance bar (FedRAMP, SOC 2 Type 2, a full ISO 27000-series spread, CSA STAR Level 2) is the deepest of the eight. One material fact for evaluating it: the company is no longer independent, because ServiceNow completed a $2.85B acquisition of Moveworks in December 2025.
Glean is also employee-facing, but arrives from the opposite direction: rather than starting from a specific job (tickets, workflows, CRM records) and adding agents, it starts from permission-aware search across 100+ connected systems and a Knowledge Graph, then layers Glean Assistant (chat) and Glean Agents (a no-code builder) on top of that same indexed knowledge. That foundation is backed by real scale: a $7.2B valuation as of its June 2025 Series F, over $765M raised, and customers like Zillow (3,400+ internal agents built) and Ericsson (2,700+). It also ships MCP support in both directions today, a capability Moveworks' own blog still calls "planned." Like Moveworks, pricing is entirely sales-gated with no published rate card; independent buyer-data aggregation puts the median deal near $98,890/year.
Every entry is a Published listing that already cleared this site's per-listing quality gate: sourced facts, admitted weaknesses, a "best for" and a "not for," re-verified on a rolling cadence (see /methodology). agent-platforms (Build group) has grown from the 4-listing minimum that first qualified it for a standalone ranking to 13, and, unlike coding-agents and frameworks, was never named as already-adequately-covered by the flagship grouping alone, so this remains a genuine, dedicated page rather than a revisit of a settled call. Sierra also carries the agent-platforms tag but is excluded here: it is a vertical customer-support product, already ranked as the lead entry of /best-ai-support-agents, not a general-purpose agent-building platform. Botsify carries the agent-platforms tag too, offering a no-code builder plus a genuine White Label reseller program, but is excluded here for the same reason as Sierra: it is a vertical support/lead-gen/booking tool, ranked instead in /best-ai-support-agents, not a general-purpose platform for arbitrary automation. Botpress, by contrast, is included: despite handling plenty of customer-support deployments in practice, its own positioning is a general-purpose conversational-agent platform (any channel, any use case an engineering team wires up), not a vertical support product the way Sierra and Botsify are. That is the same distinction that keeps n8n and Dify in this ranking despite also being usable for support work. OpenClaw, the newest addition, earns the same "general-purpose" test on different grounds: it isn't vertical at all, since its skills system and messaging-channel reach are deliberately unscoped to any one job, but it is built for a single operator rather than a shared team account, the one respect in which it differs from the other eleven. That's a real difference in who buys it, not a reason to exclude it from a page about building and deploying agents in production: a growing share of "agent platforms" traffic is individual developers standing up their own automation, and OpenClaw is the clearest self-hosted, single-operator answer to that job in this index. The ordering runs open-and-self-hosted-and-personal-first (OpenClaw), through open-and-personal-with-a-cloud-option (Vellum), through open-and-automation-first (n8n), through open-and-app/RAG-first (Dify), through open-and-conversation-first (Botpress), to open-and-all-in-one-workspace (Sim), to closed-and-simplest (Lindy), to closed-and-shared-workspace (Vecbase), to closed-and-broadest (MindStudio), to closed-and-most-production-grade (Relevance AI), to the CRM-native enterprise outlier (Salesforce Agentforce), to the ticket-resolution employee-facing outlier (Moveworks), closing with the search-first employee-facing outlier (Glean). The grouping follows the openness, pricing-predictability, CRM-nativeness and customer-vs-employee splits described above rather than a single "best overall" pick, since the thirteen serve different jobs. The live score chip on every card (evidence, honesty, depth, freshness) is computed the same way as that tool's own listing page.
The ranking
Open and self-hostable: single-operator first, reachable from messaging apps instead of a dashboard.
Editor’s pick
#1
OpenClaw
Self-hosted gateway that connects chat apps like WhatsApp, Telegram and Slack to AI agents on your own machine.
Best forDevelopers and self-hosters who already run their own infrastructure and want one personal AI agent that reaches WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Signal and iMessage instead of a separate app.
The most radically open and self-hosted entry in this ranking: MIT-licensed, model-agnostic, and built for a single operator rather than a team, reachable from the messaging apps you already use instead of a dashboard.
Open and self-hostable, with a cloud option: a personal AI assistant, not a team workflow builder
- #2
Vellum
Personal AI assistant with persistent memory and its own tools, run on Vellum Cloud or self-hosted.
Vellum is open source and can self-host on a user's own hardware, a VPS or a private cloud with no platform fee, or run in Vellum Cloud starting from a Free Base plan with paid packages beginning at $30/month (Mighty): model usage is pass-through, billed at cost with no markup. Unlike the workflow and multi-agent platforms elsewhere on this page, it targets one person rather than a team: a single persistent-memory assistant with a built-in skill library (email, calendar, browsing, phone calls, coding) reachable across web, macOS, iOS, Slack, Telegram and a terminal, gated by explicit Allow/Deny, risk-badged prompts before it touches files, accounts or the screen. Independent write-ups of its pricing disagree with the vendor's current plan structure, so verify current rates directly, and granting phone-calling and screen-control access to a persistent-memory assistant is a real trust surface even with permission gates in place.
Open and self-hostable: workflow automation first, with AI-agent nodes built in
- #3
n8n
Workflow automation platform for building and running AI agents on a visual canvas, with code where needed.
Best forOps and automation teams who want to build agentic workflows visually while keeping data on self-hosted infrastructure.
n8n is fair-code (source-available, not OSI-approved) and free to self-host, with a visual canvas, 400+ app integrations and native AI-agent nodes so an agent can actually take actions (update a CRM, post to Slack, hit an API), not just answer a question. Cloud pricing is flat and published, from €20/month. The trade-off is scope: it is an automation platform an agent plugs into, not an agent-first product, and deeply branching agent logic can get harder to read on a canvas than in code.
Open and self-hostable: an LLM-app and RAG platform first, with agents built in
Best forDevelopers and teams who want an open-source, self-hostable platform to build RAG apps and agents with full data control.
Dify is open-source (Apache-2.0-derived, 149K+ GitHub stars) and self-hostable via Docker, with a built-in RAG pipeline, model-agnostic runtime across hundreds of LLMs, and a visual Workflow Studio that publishes apps as a hosted page, a REST API, an embed or an MCP tool. Cloud pricing is flat and published too, from $590/year. Its licence carries conditions beyond pure Apache-2.0 (check before commercial resale), and deeply bespoke agent logic can still be easier in a code-first framework.
Open and self-hostable: a conversational agent and chat-channel platform first
- #5
Botpress
AI agent platform with a visual studio, a code-first TypeScript ADK and a helpdesk, priced per conversation.
Best forEngineering-led teams building a multi-channel AI support agent who want an open-source, self-hostable core with an optional managed cloud layer.
Botpress is genuinely MIT-licensed (~14.8k GitHub stars) and free to self-host, built around one conversational agent deployed across a website widget, WhatsApp, Messenger, Slack, Teams, Telegram and Twilio voice, with bi-directional MCP support (consume external MCP servers, or expose itself as one). Its managed cloud now runs Free at $0 (100 conversations, 3 seats, 3 AI agents), Plus at $150/month billed annually (250 conversations, $25 AI usage included) and Team at $750/month (1,500 conversations, $150 AI usage included), with AI usage INCLUDED on paid tiers rather than billed separately, and a 20% discount on annual billing. It is the newest and smallest by funding here ($25M Series B vs. n8n's and Dify's larger rounds) and is explicit that it is not a no-code tool: independent reviews describe needing at least one developer to wire up tool calls.
Open and self-hostable: an all-in-one AI workspace first
- #6
Sim
Open-source AI workspace for building, deploying and running agents across 1,000+ integrations.
Best forDev teams wanting an open-source, API-first workspace to build and deploy AI agents
Sim is open-source (Apache-2.0, 29.4k GitHub stars) and self-hostable, pairing workflow orchestration with a Knowledge Base, Tables for structured data and a shared file store: a broader all-in-one workspace than a single-purpose automation or RAG tool. Pricing is flat and published: free, then $25/user (Pro) and $100/user (Max) per month. But core enterprise features (SSO, SOC2 compliance, self-hosting) sit behind a sales-gated Enterprise tier, and the vendor's own pages disagree on how many integrations it offers (244 vs. 1,000+); treat that figure, and its claimed 100,000+ builders, as vendor-reported only.
Closed and cloud-only: the simplest on-ramp to a single AI "employee"
Best forTeams that want an AI teammate embedded in Slack and a no-code app builder under the same plan, with usage that pauses at the credit cap rather than overage-billing.
Lindy is the most approachable of the four: describe an agent in plain language, wire a trigger and some of its 100+ integrations, and it runs recurring email, meeting and CRM work on its own, with human-in-the-loop approval by default. There is no permanent free plan, only a 7-day trial, and usage is metered in credits: independent reviews repeatedly flag overage charges as a billing surprise once real usage ramps up.
Closed and cloud-only: a shared workspace you staff, not a builder you configure
Best forSmall teams or solo operators who want pre-built AI agent roles, shared files, and OAuth-driven workflows under one credit-based subscription.
Vecbase inverts the model the other seven share. Instead of composing a workflow, you staff a workspace with agents from pre-built roles (Researcher, Coder, Writer, Operator) that work on common memory, files and a shared team Drive, each inside its own sandbox, with every step visible live in a chat feed and replayable afterwards. Pricing has shifted to usage-based across Plus and Pro tiers (the public page no longer shows a fixed monthly price), and agents run on Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek or Vecbase's own model billed per token, so it is not a bet on a single vendor. The honest limits are real: both plans cap a workspace at 10 agents, there is no free tier or trial, there is no public API to build on, documentation and support are primarily in Chinese, and it is the least independently covered product on this page: our research rests on the vendor's own site plus one third-party directory, not a broad review record.
Closed and cloud-only: breadth-first, one platform instead of many tools
- #9
MindStudio
No-code visual builder for AI agent workflows, published as web apps, APIs, webhooks or MCP servers.
MindStudio bets on breadth over focus: 200+ models behind one at-cost router, roughly 200 drag-and-drop capabilities and 1,000+ integrations, used at TikTok, Microsoft, Intel, Adobe and Oracle. The tradeoff is pricing clarity: independent write-ups quote the Individual plan anywhere from $16 to $20/month, and Remy, its from-spec app builder, is still alpha.
Closed and cloud-only: the most production-grade, built for multi-agent "workforces"
- #10
Relevance AI
Hosted low-code platform for building, evaluating and running teams of business AI agents.
Best forRevenue, ops, and customer success teams running 5+ agents in production, who want multi-agent orchestration with evals, tracing, and SSO-grade governance on one bill.
Relevance AI is purpose-built for coordinated multi-agent teams rather than a single bot, with the production plumbing (a cost-optimising LLM router across Claude/GPT/Gemini, evals, tracing, approvals and RBAC/SSO) that separates a demo from something to trust with live pipeline. Pricing today is Free at $0/month (200 Actions, no credit card), Pro from $19/month billed annually, Team from $234/month billed annually, and Enterprise on a sales call, though the listing still flags an Actions-plus-Vendor-Credits meter as easy to misjudge on AI-heavy agents, and the flagship Bosh BDR agent is a custom, multi-week enterprise onboarding, not a self-serve click.
CRM-native: the enterprise outlier, bundled into an existing Salesforce investment
- #11
Salesforce Agentforce
Salesforce's platform for building, deploying and monitoring AI agents on top of CRM data.
Best forSalesforce service, sales, field-service and employee-support teams that need agents to act on CRM records and have Salesforce admin or developer capacity.
Agentforce puts agents directly against live Salesforce sales, service and commerce data (every agent can call Flows, Apex and MuleSoft, not just chat about a record), and it is genuinely model-agnostic (GPT-5.x, Claude, Gemini via its Models API), with a real Agent API, Python SDK and CLI. General availability since October 2024, since rebranded "Agentforce 360." The tradeoff is Salesforce-scale complexity: mutually-exclusive Flex Credits/Conversations pricing that has already reshaped itself more than once, a separately-priced Data Cloud dependency for full context, and independent reports of multi-week pilots and multi-month rollouts.
Employee-facing, ticket-resolution first: never touches customer support
- #12
Moveworks
Enterprise AI assistant plus a low-code studio for building agents across business systems.
Best forLarge, often regulated enterprises (finance, healthcare, government-adjacent) that want one AI assistant handling IT, HR and finance requests across 100+ existing systems, and that value deep compliance certification over self-serve simplicity.
Moveworks resolves IT, HR and finance requests for a company's own EMPLOYEES (not customers) across 100+ connected systems (ServiceNow, Workday, Okta, Salesforce), with the deepest compliance certification list here (FedRAMP, SOC 2 Type 2, full ISO 27000-series, CSA STAR Level 2). There is no public list price. Independent buyer-data aggregation puts the median annual contract at $130,000 with a $89,500–$271,333 range, and implementation alone runs $50K–$200K, and, as of December 2025, it is no longer an independent company: ServiceNow completed a $2.85B acquisition that buyer analyses expect to reshape its pricing and roadmap.
Employee-facing, search-first: a Knowledge Graph with agents layered on top
- #13
Glean
Enterprise AI platform for building, governing and running agents on permission-aware company context.
Best forLarge and mid-market enterprises whose biggest AI-agent blocker is fragmented, permission-sensitive knowledge scattered across 100+ internal tools, and who want employees building department-specific agents on that indexed knowledge without writing code.
Glean also resolves entirely inward, but starts from permission-aware search across 100+ connected systems and a Knowledge Graph rather than a specific job like tickets: Glean Assistant (chat) and Glean Agents (no-code builder) both read from that same indexed knowledge. Backed by a $7.2B valuation (June 2025) and customers running thousands of internally-built agents (Zillow 3,400+, Ericsson 2,700+), it ships MCP support in both directions today. There is no public pricing here either: independent buyer-data aggregation puts the median deal near $98,890/year.
In this category, not yet ranked
Best forIndividuals and teams who want to offload whole multi-step tasks (research, simple builds, data work) to an autonomous agent rather than prompt a chatbot turn by turn.
- #15
ElevenLabs Agents
Hosted platform for building voice and chat agents, with telephony, SDKs and a choice of LLM.
Best forDevelopers and product teams who want ElevenLabs' voice quality and cloning as the foundation of their agent, and are comfortable assembling the rest of the stack themselves.
- #16
GC AI
Legal AI platform for in-house teams: contract drafting, review, playbooks and US case law research.
Best forIn-house legal teams and corporate counsel who need fast, cited research across US case law, statutes and regulations without engaging outside counsel for a first pass.
Best forDevelopers and researchers who specifically need an agent whose memory, skills and identity genuinely persist and evolve across long-running sessions, rather than reset on every call.
- #18
Cresta
Contact-centre AI platform for voice and digital AI agents, real-time human agent assist, and conversation analytics.
Best forLarge enterprises running high-volume
- #19
Genspark
All-in-one AI workspace of autonomous agents for research, slides, docs, code, images and video.
Best forA consultant, marketer, founder or operations lead who wants research, files, code, slides and media handled in one web workspace.
- #20
Agno
Python SDK, open-source AgentOS runtime and hosted control plane for building and operating agents.
Best forPython developers who want an Apache 2.0 SDK with memory, knowledge, learning, guardrails and a Control Plane they run inside their own cloud account, and who are comfortable running Docker or a cloud deploy template themselves.
- #21
UiPath Agent Builder
Low-code canvas in UiPath Studio Web for building AI agents that run on the UiPath automation platform.
- #22
Aisera Agent Studio
No-code canvas for building, testing and deploying enterprise AI agents from natural-language instructions.
Side by side
Scroll across to compare every product. Feature names stay in view.
| Feature | OpenClaw | Vellum | n8n | Dify | Botpress | Sim | Lindy | Vecbase | MindStudio | Relevance AI | Salesforce Agentforce | Moveworks | Glean | Manus | ElevenLabs Agents | GC AI | Letta | Cresta | Genspark | Agno | UiPath Agent Builder | Aisera Agent Studio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Self-hosted gateway that connects chat apps like WhatsApp, Telegram and Slack to AI agents on your own machine. | Personal AI assistant with persistent memory and its own tools, run on Vellum Cloud or self-hosted. | Workflow automation platform for building and running AI agents on a visual canvas, with code where needed. | Open-source platform for building agentic workflows, AI agents and RAG knowledge pipelines. | AI agent platform with a visual studio, a code-first TypeScript ADK and a helpdesk, priced per conversation. | Open-source AI workspace for building, deploying and running agents across 1,000+ integrations. | AI teammate in Slack, email and meetings, sold per seat with a shared credit pool. | Workspace where named AI agents get their own sandbox, files, tool grants and schedules. | No-code visual builder for AI agent workflows, published as web apps, APIs, webhooks or MCP servers. | Hosted low-code platform for building, evaluating and running teams of business AI agents. | Salesforce's platform for building, deploying and monitoring AI agents on top of CRM data. | Enterprise AI assistant plus a low-code studio for building agents across business systems. | Enterprise AI platform for building, governing and running agents on permission-aware company context. | General-purpose AI agent that plans and executes tasks in its own cloud computer. | Hosted platform for building voice and chat agents, with telephony, SDKs and a choice of LLM. | Legal AI platform for in-house teams: contract drafting, review, playbooks and US case law research. | Stateful agent harness, cloud and SDK for agents with persistent, git-versioned memory. | Contact-centre AI platform for voice and digital AI agents, real-time human agent assist, and conversation analytics. | All-in-one AI workspace of autonomous agents for research, slides, docs, code, images and video. | Python SDK, open-source AgentOS runtime and hosted control plane for building and operating agents. | Low-code canvas in UiPath Studio Web for building AI agents that run on the UiPath automation platform. | No-code canvas for building, testing and deploying enterprise AI agents from natural-language instructions. |
| Category | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Research & data agents, Agent platforms | Voice agents, Agent platforms | Research & data agents, Agent platforms, Legal agents | Agent frameworks, Agent platforms, Coding agents | Support agents, Agent platforms | Research & data agents, Agent platforms | Agent frameworks, Agent platforms | Agent platforms | Agent platforms |
| Pricing | $20 trial credit / monthly | $0 / month | Free | Free | $0 | $0 / forever | $29.99/mo | Usage-based | $0 / month | $0/month | Free | Custom | Custom | Free | $0 / mo | $500/month | $0 / month | $150,000 / year (12-month contract) | Free | Free | Paid | Paid |
| API | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tags |
Get quotes from the top agents
Describe what you need. We route it to the best-matched providers.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the best AI agent platform?
- It depends on how much control you need over hosting and code, whether you're already on Salesforce, and whether you're building for customers or your own staff. For an open, self-hostable automation platform with AI-agent nodes bolted on, n8n. For an open, self-hostable platform built around LLM apps and RAG specifically, Dify. For an open (genuinely MIT-licensed), self-hostable platform built specifically around one conversational agent deployed across many chat channels, Botpress. For the simplest no-code on-ramp to a single AI "employee," Lindy. For production-grade, coordinated multi-agent "workforces" with enterprise controls, Relevance AI. For an enterprise already running on Salesforce CRM that wants agents acting directly on live sales/service/commerce data, Agentforce. For a deeply-certified assistant that resolves EMPLOYEE (not customer) IT/HR/finance requests, Moveworks. For permission-aware search across 100+ systems with agents grounded in that indexed knowledge, Glean.
- Which AI agent platforms are open-source and self-hostable?
- n8n (fair-code, source-available, free to self-host), Dify (Apache-2.0-derived, 149K+ GitHub stars, self-hostable via Docker) and Botpress (genuinely MIT-licensed, ~14.8k GitHub stars, free to self-host). Botpress is the only one of the three with no licence conditions beyond the standard MIT terms. Lindy, Relevance AI, Salesforce Agentforce, Moveworks and Glean are all closed-source and cloud-only, with no self-hosting option.
- Why isn’t Sierra on this list if it’s tagged as an agent platform?
- Sierra is a vertical customer-support agent product — an enterprise "agent OS" for resolving customer issues — not a general-purpose platform for building an arbitrary agent. It is already ranked as the lead entry of the dedicated /best-ai-support-agents page instead of appearing here too.
- Which of these platforms has predictable, flat pricing?
- n8n and Dify both publish flat monthly or annual Cloud tiers. Botpress publishes flat base tiers too (Free / $150 / $750 per month) and INCLUDES a baseline of AI usage on paid tiers rather than billing for it separately, so the published price covers anything below the bundled allowance. Lindy and Relevance AI both meter usage in credits instead — independent reviews flag Lindy's overage charges as a recurring surprise, and Relevance AI's own dual "Actions plus Vendor Credits" meter is easy to misjudge on AI-heavy agents. Salesforce Agentforce, Moveworks and Glean are the most opaque of the nine: Agentforce meters via mutually-exclusive Flex Credits or Conversations plus separate per-user licenses, Moveworks publishes no pricing at all (third-party buyer reports put realistic annual spend around $50K–$270K+), and neither does Glean (independent buyer-data aggregation puts its median annual deal near $98,890, ranging $29,880–$208,897).
- Do any of these AI agent platforms have a free plan?
- n8n (free Community self-hosted edition), Dify (free Community self-hosted edition, plus a free Sandbox on Cloud), Botpress (free self-hosted MIT core, plus a free pay-as-you-go tier on its managed cloud), Relevance AI (a free self-serve tier with a monthly Actions allowance) and Salesforce Agentforce (a free Foundations tier with 200,000 Flex Credits) all have a genuine free option. Lindy, Moveworks and Glean do not — Lindy offers only a 7-day trial, and neither Moveworks nor Glean has a free tier or trial at any size.
- Which of these is for employees rather than customers?
- Moveworks and Glean. Every other platform here (n8n, Dify, Botpress, Lindy, Relevance AI, Salesforce Agentforce) can point its agents at customers, staff, or both depending on configuration — Moveworks and Glean are both built exclusively for a company's own employees and never touch customer-facing support, though they take different approaches: Moveworks resolves specific IT/HR/ finance tickets, while Glean starts from permission-aware search and knowledge grounding across 100+ systems. Moveworks is also no longer an independent company: ServiceNow completed a $2.85B acquisition of it in December 2025.
- Is there an AI agent platform built natively into a CRM?
- Yes — Salesforce Agentforce. Unlike the other platforms here, which are adopted as standalone tools, Agentforce runs against a company's existing Salesforce data and requires that CRM investment underneath it. In exchange, its agents can take action directly on live sales, service and commerce records through Salesforce Flows, Apex and MuleSoft — deeper native CRM integration than any general-purpose platform in this category offers.
Advertise here
Reach buyers mid-decision. Reach builders choosing their next agent. Promote your brand with a display placement or bring your listing into focus with Featured.
Explore owner options →Advertise on this page →The digestFree
Which agents actually ship.
What we re-checked, what got added, and one number from the index. Tuesdays.
One-click unsubscribe