AI Agent Tools You Can Self-Host

28 of the 66 tools in our index can run somewhere you control — 11 with no managed-cloud alternative at all, and 17 that pair a self-hostable core with an optional paid managed layer on top. This is a deployment question, not a license one: 10 of the 28 are closed-source or license-hedged products with a genuine private-deployment path anyway.

Every listing in our index carries a `deployment` field — Cloud, Self-host, or Both — researched and sourced the same way as pricing or license. 28 of the 66 current tools set it to Self-host or Both, meaning code and data can stay inside infrastructure you control instead of a vendor's cloud, at some price. See our full [deployment census](/blog/ai-agent-deployment-census-2026/) for the category-by-category breakdown this collection is drawn from.

This list is deliberately not the same set as our [open-source collection](/collections/open-source-ai-agent-tools/), even though the two overlap heavily. All 18 tools on that list are also here, because a clean open-source license almost always means you can run the code yourself. But 10 more tools clear this list's bar without clearing that one: Mastra and Claude Agent SDK are open at the core but carry a license condition or commercial-terms wrapper that keeps them off the clean-license list; n8n and Dify are source-available/fair-code rather than a no-strings OSI license; and Factory, CodeRabbit, Bland AI, Windsurf, Warp and OpenHands are closed-source products that still sell (or in Windsurf's case, ship free) a genuine private-deployment or local-execution path. If a compliance team's real question is "can this run inside our own network," the license badge alone answers it wrong for a third of this list.

The category split is uneven in a way worth knowing before you shop by category page alone: agent frameworks are unanimous (11 of 11 offer some self-host path — a framework you cannot run yourself is arguably not a framework), coding agents are the most genuinely mixed category (12 of 19), and support agents plus sales/marketing agents offer zero — every one of those 14 tools is cloud-only at any price, so a hard data-residency requirement in either category currently has no architectural answer on this site, only a contractual one (a vendor DPA or regional hosting commitment).

Why this collection

A tool earns a place here if its own Published, sourced listing sets its `deployment` field to Self-host or Both, verified against the vendor's own docs or pricing page describing an actual self-run, on-premise, air-gapped, or local-execution option — not a roadmap promise or a generic "enterprise-ready" claim. This is a deployment-location question, independent of license: an entry may be open-source with no managed layer at all, open-source with an optional paid cloud add-on, source-available under a fair-code or added-conditions license, or fully closed-source with a paid tier that still lets you keep data inside your own infrastructure. For the license-only question, see the [open-source collection](/collections/open-source-ai-agent-tools/); for the full category-by-category count, see the [deployment census](/blog/ai-agent-deployment-census-2026/) this collection is built from.