Research report · data-report
In your pipeline: a census of 145 listings
27 of 145 listings answer yes for “In your pipeline”. Counted from our own datasheet, with the query that reproduces every figure.
On this page
In your pipeline, across 145 settled listings
Of the 145 Published listings whose datasheet settles “In your pipeline”, the largest group is “Does not apply” at 53 (37%). Measured 2026-10-08.
Explore the matching agents
In your pipeline · Datasheet criterion surface_ci · Report counted .
Current listings as of ; this set may differ from the report's original sample. Includes “Yes” and “Qualified” answers only. Read the conditions on qualified answers before treating them as a match. “No”, “Not applicable” and “Not established” answers are excluded.
View 68 current matching records
- Ada Qualified
Not a pull-request agent, but Ada documents authoring code tools through the Platform API for code already reviewed in a repository or CI pipeline, which is the only CI path on the sheet.
Source retrieved 2026-10-08
- AgentsKit Qualified
Eval results can be written as JUnit, Markdown or GitHub annotations so a failing suite blocks a pull request, which is reporting into CI rather than an agent that acts on the diff itself.
Source retrieved 2026-10-08
- Aider Qualified
Non-interactive runs are scriptable from a shell loop with --message and --yes, but nothing on the site documents acting on a pull request or a hosted CI integration.
Source retrieved 2026-09-30
- Antigravity CLI Yes
Headless print mode is built for pipelines, returning JSON or NDJSON events; an unauthenticated CI run fails fast rather than hanging, and a Gemini API key avoids the browser sign-in.
Source retrieved 2026-09-10
- Augment Code Yes
--print mode is built for CI/CD, and GitHub/GitLab triggers act on pull requests and failed runs.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Bitsclan IT Solutions Qualified
CI/CD exists here as a delivery practice they operate on client pipelines as a DevOps service, not as an agent that acts on a pull request or comments on a diff.
Source retrieved 2026-09-11
- Bolt Qualified
Through the GitHub MCP connector it can open issues and pull requests from chat, but it cannot run as a step in a CI pipeline or review a PR automatically.
Source retrieved 2026-09-11
- Botpress Qualified
A bot can subscribe to pull-request and issue events and post comments through the GitHub integration, but there is no GitHub Action or CI runner: shipping is the local adk deploy command.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Browserbase Yes
Documented GitHub Actions workflow creates a session, inspects the live DOM and opens a pull request.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Cartesia Qualified
Deployments can be triggered by pushing to a linked GitHub repository, but there is no pull-request or CI review surface.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Claude Agent SDK Yes
Bare mode exists for CI reproducibility, and exit codes plus init-event fields let a pipeline fail on a bad run.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Claude Code Yes
GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD run it in your own pipelines; a managed GitHub PR reviewer exists on Team and Enterprise.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Cline Yes
The CLI is documented as a GitHub Actions step that reviews pull requests unattended and posts inline comments; the vendor also names GitLab and other pipelines.
Source retrieved 2026-09-12
- CodeRabbit Yes
It acts on pull requests automatically and reads pipeline output from five CI systems; an agentic API key also authenticates the CLI inside CI runners and bots.
Source retrieved 2026-09-15
- Codex CLI Yes
codex exec runs non-interactively in pipelines, with JSONL output and API-key or workload-identity auth.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- CrewAI Qualified
Deployments connect to GitHub repositories and agents can file issues and cut releases, but the documented action list contains no pull-request review or CI job step.
Source retrieved 2026-09-13
- Cursor Yes
The CLI runs headless in CI with an API key, and Bugbot acts on pull requests as a pre-merge check.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Decagon Qualified
Agent versions can be tested from CI/CD pipelines and versioned in Git, but nothing describes Decagon acting on a pull request itself.
Source retrieved 2026-09-14
- Devin Yes
Creates pull requests and answers PR comments inside your repositories once the SCM integration is installed.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Devin Desktop Qualified
PR review automation over a GitHub org is an Admin Portal toggle and agent PRs surface in Spaces, but the IDE does not run as a CI job; Devin Review is a separate product line.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- Dify Qualified
The CLI is documented for CI pipelines, so apps can run as a build step; there is no pull-request review or repo-acting surface.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Dust Qualified
Agents can be triggered by webhooks carrying GitHub, Jira or Slack events and can act on pull requests, but no first-party CI runner or pipeline step is documented.
Source retrieved 2026-10-01
- ElevenLabs Agents Yes
Agents deploy from CI with an API key in the environment; the unit of change is the agent configuration, not a pull request in your code.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Factory Yes
Droid Exec plus the Factory-AI/droid-action GitHub Action review and act on pull requests inside your runners.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Gemini Code Assist Yes
Acts on pull requests through the Gemini Code Assist on GitHub app, quoted at 100+ PR reviews per day; its enterprise version is in Preview. No other CI runner integration is documented.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Genspark Qualified
Claw connects GitHub under Developer Tools and can act on pull requests via a saved session; no CI runner, webhook or PR-triggered automation is documented.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- GitHub Copilot Yes
Copilot CLI runs in GitHub Actions with the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN, and both code review and the cloud agent execute on Actions runners and consume Actions minutes.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Glean Qualified
Agents act on pull requests through the GitHub API, writing comments, descriptions and patches, but Glean runs no CI job of its own and respects existing branch protections.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Google Agent Development Kit (ADK) Qualified
The CLI is documented for scripted and CI/CD use and evaluations run headless, but nothing on the site describes ADK acting on a pull request by itself without an agent you build.
Source retrieved 2026-09-15
- goose Yes
The vendor publishes a full GitHub Actions workflow that installs a pinned goose CLI, runs goose against the PR diff and posts the result as a pull request comment.
Source retrieved 2026-09-16
- Gumloop Qualified
Webhook triggers let GitHub, a cron job or an internal script start an agent, but the vendor documents no CI-native runner or agent that acts on a pull request.
Source retrieved 2026-09-30
- HOL Guard Qualified
Runtime Guard is local only; CI gating comes from the separate plugin-scanner GitHub Action for maintainers, not the runtime layer.
Source retrieved 2026-09-29
- Juggler Qualified
`juggler run` is built for CI jobs, git hooks and batch work with typed exit codes, but there is no PR-review or CI integration of its own.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Junie Yes
A headless flag plus a published GitHub Action and GitLab CI integration let it act on issues, pull requests and failed builds without an interactive terminal.
Source retrieved 2026-09-18
- Kilo Code Yes
Reviews can fire automatically on PR creation, and Cloud Agent sessions can be started by webhook.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- LangChain Yes
The vendor documents a GitHub Actions pipeline that runs tests and offline evals on a pull request, then promotes preview deployments to production through the control-plane API.
Source retrieved 2026-09-18
- Langflow Qualified
Flows are callable from any pipeline through the documented HTTP API and API-key header, but no pull-request integration, GitHub action or CI-specific surface is documented by the vendor.
Source retrieved 2026-09-25
- LangGraph Yes
The vendor publishes a CI/CD reference pipeline with a companion repository: tests and offline evals on a PR, then quality-gated preview and production deploys via the Control Plane API.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Letta Yes
A GitHub Action triggers agents from issues and PR comments, or automatically on pull_request events.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- LiveKit Agents Qualified
CI is a deployment surface, not an acting surface: an official GitHub Action deploys the agent on push. The agent itself never acts on a pull request.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- LlamaIndex Qualified
CI use is deployment only: a spec kept in source control, applied on every push.
- Manus Qualified
The GitHub connector lets it open and close pull requests and issues and keeps main in two-way sync, but no CI runner, GitHub Action or pipeline trigger is documented on the pages read.
Source retrieved 2026-09-19
- Mastra Qualified
Scorers and eval suites run in CI through Vitest/Jest via runEvals; the vendor claims no agent that acts on a pull request.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- MindStudio Qualified
The Node client is documented for CI/CD use, with an offline type-sync mode and API keys held as CI environment variables, but no pull-request, commit or repository integration is published.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Moveworks Qualified
It reacts to external systems through webhook and scheduled triggers, including a documented GitHub webhook, but it does not act on pull requests as a CI participant.
Source retrieved 2026-09-20
- Muse Code Qualified
It runs unattended in a pipeline with an API key and emits JSONL events, but the sandbox needs working bubblewrap on Linux and no pull-request integration is documented.
Source retrieved 2026-09-20
- n8n Yes
Git source control with workflow diffs gates what reaches production, the n8n CLI page names CI/CD pipeline integration as a fit, and the GitHub Trigger node fires on pull request events.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- OmniDimension Qualified
The vendor points CI and headless automation at the local API-key MCP server and the REST API, but nothing in the product acts on a pull request.
Source retrieved 2026-09-09
- OpenClaw Qualified
A CI job can start and observe agent runs over the Gateway WebSocket RPC protocol, and the publication broker opens pull requests; there is no first-party GitHub Action or PR-triggered reviewer.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- OpenCode Yes
It runs inside your own GitHub Actions runner, triggered by comments, PR events, cron schedules or manual dispatch.
Source retrieved 2026-09-21
- OpenHands Yes
Ships as GitHub Actions plugins for PR review and QA, and headless mode is documented specifically for CI/CD pipelines.
Source retrieved 2026-09-21
- Perplexity Qualified
The Agent API can open and update pull requests through the GitHub connector, which is in preview; no CI runner or GitHub Action is documented.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- PolyAI Yes
poly push is CI-compatible and the Agents API lets a pipeline gate promotion on a passing simulation-test set.
Source retrieved 2026-09-02
- Pydantic AI Yes
A pydantic-ai engine for GitHub Agentic Workflows runs your agent from a Markdown workflow file on issues, pull requests or a schedule, writing back through gh-aw safe outputs; the engine declares itself experimental to gh-aw.
Source retrieved 2026-09-21
- Salesforce Agentforce Qualified
Agent tests run in a CI system via Salesforce CLI and DevOps Center tools handle pull requests and pipeline promotion, but Salesforce documents no agent that runs on a pull request by itself.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- SEOmatic Qualified
It opens pull requests on code-built sites and emits signed webhooks, but webhooks are Infrastructure-only and there is no documented CI job or pipeline action.
Source retrieved 2026-10-03
- Sierra Qualified
Publishing an agent can be driven from CI/CD for the ChatGPT channel; Sierra publishes no broader pipeline or pull-request integration.
Source retrieved 2026-09-26
- Sim Qualified
Deploy, undeploy and rollback are API calls intended for CI/CD pipelines; there is no pull-request review surface.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- StackAI Qualified
A GitHub node can read repositories and act on pull requests from inside a workflow, but nothing documents StackAI running as a step in a CI pipeline.
Source retrieved 2026-09-09
- Tale Qualified
Automations start from webhooks and schedules and a GitHub connector reads and manages pull requests, but agents get read-only connector actions and nothing runs as a CI job.
Source retrieved 2026-10-03
- TinyFish Qualified
The CLI documents a headless CI/CD authentication path, but nothing acts on a pull request or reports into a build.
- UiPath Agent Builder Qualified
UiPath publishes a complete GitHub Actions recipe that packs and deploys agent solutions, but the pricing comparison puts pipeline integration in the Enterprise column only, with an em dash against both Basic and Standard.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- Vapi Qualified
Evals run as pipeline quality gates via API and CLI; there is no pull-request surface because there is no code to review.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- Vecbase Qualified
An agent can act on GitHub through a scoped OAuth grant, including opening pull requests; no CI runner or pipeline integration is published.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- Warp Yes
Two paths onto a pull request: the oz-agent-action GitHub Action inside your workflows, or mentioning the GitHub App on an issue, PR or review comment with no workflow file.
Source retrieved 2026-09-03
- Zencoder Qualified
Headless agents can be triggered from GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or a webhook and act on pull requests, but that autonomous-flows capability is sold as a paid add-on from Pro Plus upward.
Source retrieved 2026-09-09
- zot Qualified
JSON event output is offered for scripts and CI, but nothing ties into a pull request or a hosted runner; you invoke the binary yourself inside your own pipeline.
Source retrieved 2026-09-28
- ZTABS Yes
Their engineers work inside your pipeline: automated suites are wired into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or CircleCI so every pull request is gated, and CI/CD construction is a separate DevOps offering.
Source retrieved 2026-09-25
The population
145 listings in this index are Published. This is the population as of 2026-10-08. 145 of the 145 published listings in this index carry a settled answer for “In your pipeline”. That row asks: Can it act on a pull request or in CI? Every listing in the index is settled on this row, so nothing is left out.
Findings
-
27 of the 145 settled listings answer “Yes” for “In your pipeline”. That is 19% of the settled set.
-
41 of the 145 settled listings answer “Qualified” for “In your pipeline”. That is 28% of the settled set.
-
15 of the 145 settled listings answer “No” for “In your pipeline”. That is 10% of the settled set.
-
53 of the 145 settled listings answer “Does not apply” for “In your pipeline”. That is 37% of the settled set.
-
9 of the 145 settled listings answer “Not established” for “In your pipeline”. That is 6% of the settled set.
1 of those yes answers is Augment Code, which still answers yes for “In your pipeline”. Its listing carries the stored answer and links to the source recorded for it. This is one worked example, not an independent audit of every source in the census.
What we counted, and how
Each figure above is a count over the “In your pipeline” row of the listing datasheet, taken from the same stored answer the listing page renders. The denominator is the 145 listings whose answer is settled, meaning one of yes, qualified, no, does not apply, not established. On this row that is the whole index, because every listing has a recognised stored answer. Every number here is stored with the read-only query that reproduces it and re-run every sixty seconds against the live corpus, so a figure that stops reproducing surfaces as drift rather than as a stale sentence nobody notices. Our full method covers how a datasheet row is settled in the first place.
Limitations
This counts stored datasheet answers, not independently tested capabilities. A sourced answer can record a vendor statement or our reading of published evidence; this census does not re-fetch those sources. “Not established” means we have not established an answer. That can reflect vendor nondisclosure, blocked evidence, or unfinished research, not a no. An absent or unrecognised answer is excluded rather than treated as a researched finding. The figures are restated when the stored corpus changes; the date above is the count used for this published version, not a new verification of the vendors.
Get the next report
New agents rankings and fresh data reports. One short email, one-click unsubscribe.